Technopioneers, raw material workers or new eugenicists? Queer perspectives on reproductive technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/ogj.2026.306Keywords:
Disability, Queer, Reproduction, Reproductive Justice, Reproductive TechnologiesAbstract
The article discusses three different theoretical traditions towards new reproductive technologies (NRT): queer-feminist approaches, Marxist feminisms and Disability Studies. Deploying the form of a semi-fictional walk, the contribution explores the differences and dissonances in the approaches to reproductive technologies. While queer-feminist approaches in NRTs see new potentials of kin ship and queer family making, Marxist feminisms approach NRTs as new forms of labour and exploitation. Disability Studies approaches problematize whether NRTs result in new eugenics.
References
Albrecht, Steffen/Grüber, Katrin (2019): Aktueller Stand und Entwicklungen der Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Endbericht zum Monitoring. In: Deutscher Bundestag – 19. Wahlperiode, Drucksache19/15000 vom 04.11.2019. https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/19/150/1915000.pdf (14.08.2024).
Achtelik, Kirsten Sasha (2017): Behindert, queer, Kinderwunsch? Ein Anstoß für die politische Debatte. In: Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (242), 16–19. Behindert, queer, Kinderwunsch? | Gen-ethisches Netzwerk e.V.
Achtelik, Kirsten Sasha (2016): (K)eine Liste? Bereits die zweite Veröffentlichung detaillierter Daten durch ein zertifiziertes PID-Zentrum rüttelt am Geheimhaltungsgebot und bereitet den Weg für eine Indikationsliste. In: Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (238), 45–46. https://gen-ethisches-netzwerk.de/files/GID238_Achtelik_.pdf (02.01.2018).
Achtelik, Kirsten Sasha (2015): Selbstbestimmte Norm. Feminismus, Pränataldiagnostik, Abtreibung. Berlin: Verbrecher Verlag. doi: 10.14766/1196
Beatie, Thomas (2008): Labor of love: Is society ready for this pregnant husband? https://www.advocate.com/news/2008/03/14/labor-love (04.10.2025).
Berkowitz, Dana (2007): A sociohistorical analysis of gay men’s procreative consciousness. In: Journal of GLBT Family Studies 3 (2–3), 157–190. doi: 10.1300/J461V03N02_07
Cooper, Melinda (2008): Life as surplus: Biotechnology & capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle/London: University of Washington Press. doi: 10.1515/9780295990316
Duggan, Lisa (2002): The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In: Castronovo, Russ/Nelson, Dana (Hg.): Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics. Durham: Duke, 175–194. doi: 10.1215/9780822383901
Goodchild, Sophie (2009): Fertility clinics to recruit more lesbians as egg donors for IVF. https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/fertility-clinics-to-recruit-more-lesbians-as-egg-donors-for-ivf-6754421.html (30.06.2021)
Halberstam, J. Jack [Judith] (2008): Animating revolt/revolting animation: Penguin love, doll sex and the spectacle of the queer nonhuman. In: Giffney, Noreen/Hird, Myra J. (Hg.): Queering the non/human. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate, 265–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01214.x
Kafer, Alison (2013): Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. doi: 10.16995/sim.11
Krishnan, Manisha (2017): Ein Transmann erzählt von seiner Schwangerschaft: „Ich will nicht sein wie ein biologischer Mann“. www.vice.com/de/article/nevwnx/wir-haben-uns-mit-einem-schwangeren-transmann-unterhalten (4.10.2025).
London Women’s Clinic (2021): Single woman treatment – lesbian couples. https://www.londonwomensclinic.com/fertility-services/lesbian-couples/ (30.06.2021)
Mamo, Laura (2018): Queering reproduction in transnational bio-economies. In: Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online (7), 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.008
Michalik, Regina (2001): The desire for philosophy. Interview with Judith Butler. http://criticaltheorylibrary.blogspot.com/2011/05/judith-butler-desire-forphilosophy.html (14.08.2024).
Mundy, Liz (2002): A world of their own. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/2002/03/31/a-world-of-their-own/abba2bbfaf01-4b55-912c-85aa46e98c6b (30.06.2021).
Nahman, Michal (2018): Migrant extractability: Centring the voices of egg providers in cross-border reproduction. In: Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 7, 82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.020
Nordqvist, Petra (2018): Feminist heterosexual imaginaries of reproduction. Lesbian conception in feminist studies of reproductive technologies. In: Feminist Theory 9 (3), 273–292. doi: 10.1177/1464700108095851
Pralat, Robert (2018): More natural does not equal more normal: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people’s views about different pathways to Parenthood. In: Journal of Family Issues 39 (18), 4179–4203. doi:10.1177/0192513X18810951
Rajani, Bhatia (2009): Pink and blue. Geschlechtsauswahl in den USA. In: Genethischer Informationsdienst (192), 29–33. https://www.gen-ethisches-netzwerk.de/pink-and-blue (01.03.2010).
Regenbogenfamilien NRW (2020): Podcast: Pflege und Adoption. www.regenbogenfamilien-nrw.de/2020/04/podcast-pflege-und-adoption/ (13.05.2020).
Smietana, Marcin/Herbrand, Cathy/Jennings, Sarah/Golombok, Susan (2015): Family relationships in gay father families. In: Freeman, Tabitha/Graham, Susanna/Ebtehaj, Fatemeh/Richards, Martin (Hg.): Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 192–211. doi: 10.11156/aibr.100307
Smietana, Marcin/Thompson, Charis/Winddance Twine, France (2018): Making and breaking families – reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together. In: Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online (7), 112–130. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001
Stacey, Judith (2018): Queer reproductive justice? In: Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, (7), 4–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.06.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ute Kalender
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All contributions in Open Gender Journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. You may freely make use of the corresponding texts in accordance to the conditions of the license (License contract, generally understandable version). There is no exclusive transfer of usage rights ("copyright transfer"). Open Gender Journal does not charge authors any costs for publication (so-called Article Processing Charges, APC) or submission (so-called Submission Charges). Authors are encouraged to share their contributions in other places, such as repositories.
