Between Body, Technology and Society

Sophie Bauer: „Das Natürlichste, was eine Frau haben kann.“ Eine Soziologie der Menstrualität. Campus 2025

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/ogj.2026.419

Keywords:

Biopolitics, Care, Cyborg, Body, Menstruality, Normativity

Abstract

In eight chapters, Bauer traces a line from feminist debates and historical conceptualizations to contemporary practices, technologies, and politics of menstruality. The foundation of the work is a re-perspectivization of menstruation as a material-discursive practice, carried out with reference both to the ideas of Donna Haraway and to those of Critical Menstruation Studies. At the center of the study are empirical insights that make visible and analytically situate diverse experiences, materials, and practices of menstruation. The book concludes with a plea for an ethics of care—one that does not individualize and privatize menstruality, but instead elevates it to a collective concern.

Author Biography

Hannah Link, Linköping University

Hannah Link received her doctorate from the University of Mainz in 2025 for her ethnographic investigation of figures of the human in robotics. Since January 2026, she has led a Walter Benjamin Fellowship on the (re)configurations of bodies through menstrual technologies at Linköping University, funded by the German Research Council. Her research interests include feminist science and technology studies with a focus on material feminisms, feminist posthumanities, and ethnography.

References

Bobel, Chris/Fahs, Breanne (2020): From Bloodless Respectability to Radical Menstrual Embodiment: Shifting Menstrual Politics from Private to Public. In: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 45 (4), S. 955–983. doi: 10.1086/707802

Bobel, Chris/Winkler, Inga T./Fahs, Breanne/Hasson, Katie Ann/Kissling, Elizabeth Arveda/Roberts, Tomi-Ann (Hg.) (2020): The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7

Degele, Nina/Schmitz, Sigrid (2010): Embodying – ein dynamischer Ansatz für Körper und Geschlecht in Bewegung. In: Degele, Nina/Schmitz, Sigrid/Mangelsdorf, Marion/Gramespacher, Elke (Hg.): Gendered Bodies in Motion. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 13–36. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvhktj8t.4

Haraway, Donna (1991): Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In: Haraway, Donna: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, S. 183–202.

Laws, Sophie (1990): Issues of Blood. The Politics of Menstruation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reckwitz, Andreas (2017): Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Wood, Jill M. (2020): (In)Visible Bleeding: The Menstrual Concealment Imperative. In: Bobel, Chris/Winkler, Inga T./Fahs, Breanne/Hasson, Katie Ann/Kissling, Elizabeth Arveda/Roberts, Tomi-Ann (Hg.): The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies. Singapore: Macmillan, S. 319–336. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_25

Cover: Bauer

Published

2026-03-03

How to Cite

Link, H. (2026). Between Body, Technology and Society: Sophie Bauer: „Das Natürlichste, was eine Frau haben kann.“ Eine Soziologie der Menstrualität. Campus 2025. Open Gender Journal, 10. https://doi.org/10.17169/ogj.2026.419

Issue

Section

querelles-net: Reviews

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.